Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 24, 1973No. 5501, C.A.D. 1102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 67 Cust. Ct. 400, C.D. 4303 (1971) overruling the importer’s protest against the classification of certain imported merchandise un*149der item 522.21 TSUS as fluorspar containing not over 97% by weight1 calcium fluoride. The importer claims the merchandise is properly classificable under item 522.24 TSUS as containing over 97% by weight of calcium fluoride. We reverse.

The fluorspar was imported from Spain in shipments entered at Point Comfort, Texas on September 6, 1967, and December 26, 1967. The record reveals that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Edson Keith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. Gage Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Draper & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Gertzen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. United States v. LozanoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anhydrides & Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Exxon Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  3. American Sporting Goods v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
  4. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  5. American Wine & Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API