Libas, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOLDBERG, Judge.
This classification case involves 32 bales of cotton fabric imported from India into the United States in 1994. The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) tested the fabric according to its “Methodology for the [AJnalysis of Woven Fabric to Determine Whether Fabric had been Power-loomed or Hand-loomed” (Customs’s test). Based on the results, Customs determined the fabric was power-loomed and classified it under subheading 5208.42.40 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), dutiable at a rate of 11.4% ad valorem and subject to a quota…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Sandra Ruffin Catherine Ruffin, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, C. Timothy Williford v. Shaw Industries, Incorporated Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Libas Ltd. v. CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Libas Ltd. v. CarilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Libas, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002