Legal Opinion

Albert F. Maurer Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 17, 1968No. C.D. 3559PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of 10 carloads of lead residue imported from Canada and entered at the port of Philadelphia in July and August of 1963. It was assessed with duty as lead dross under paragraph 392 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, at V/16 cents per pound on the lead content. It is claimed to be flue dust dutiable under paragraph 391 of said tariff act, as modified, supra, at % cent per pound on the lead content.

The pertinent provisions of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. AmendolaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  4. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Philipp Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API