Legal Opinion

Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 17, 1969No. C.D. 3902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These cases, which were consolidated for trial, involve the question as to the proper tariff levy on granulated cork that was imported from Portugal and entered at Philadelphia during the period from April 1964 to August 1965. The cork was assessed duty by the government under item 220.10 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202) as cork, granulated or ground, weighing not over 6 pounds per cubic foot uncompressed.

Plaintiff insists that the duties thus assessed and paid are excessive. It contends that the granulated cork in question weighed over 6 pounds…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Rice & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. General Dyestuff Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cork Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API