Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 2004No. B171050PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MALLANO, J.

To accommodate the connection of newly created sources of electrical energy to a transmission facility that is part of the national grid, it is often necessary to upgrade the grid at the point of interconnection. Federal law, as set forth in a recent order of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), states that the generator of the energy is initially responsible for the costs of the upgrade but further provides that the owner of the transmission facility, typically a public utility such as petitioner Southern California Edison (SCE), may elect to pay those costs.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Cases I & IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Capital Research & Management Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API