Legal Opinion
Wholesale Electricity Antitrust Cases I & II
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 26, 2007No. D047697PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants Borrego Water District et al. (Borrego), a group of public entities and retail purchasers of electricity, filed this action for damages and other relief against defendants and respondents AES Corporation et al. (AES), a number of companies and their subsidiaries which are generators, sellers, or traders of electricity at wholesale (defendants). In their master complaint filed in 2002 in these coordinated actions, plaintiffs allege violations of California’s antitrust laws (Bus. & Prof. Code, 1 § 16720; hereafter the Cartwright Act), as well as…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Electric Refund CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Cal. Crane School v. Nat. Commission for CertificationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.