Cruger's Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Polo caps and polo helmets imported at the port of New York and classified by the collector of customs as wearing apparel in chief value of cotton not specially provided for were assessed for duty at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 919 of the tariff act of 1922, which reads as follows:
Par. 919. Clothing and articles of wearing apparel of every description, manufactured wholly or in part, composed wholly or in chief value of cotton, and not specially provided for, 35 per centum ad valorem.
The importer protested that the merchandise was dutiable at 30 per cent ad valorem under paragraph…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MescallSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- National Bank of Cleburne v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- People ex rel. Cantrell v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Oppenheimer v. Greencastle School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- American Astral Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Pompeo v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Stonewall Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Newman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.