Pompeo v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
As originally enacted, paragraph 1531 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provided for—
* * * manufactures of leather * * * or of which leather * * * is the component material of chief value, not specially provided for * * *,
at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem. By the provisions of the Presidential proclamation, reported in T. D. 51802, the rate of duty on such manufactures, other than certain named articles not here *363involved, was reduced to 17% per centum ad valorem. By the provisions of the Presidential proclamations, reported in T. 'D’s. 52373 and 52476, the rate on such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cruger's Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Best v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rubie's Costume Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- H.I.M./Fathom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Beck Distributing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Admiral Craft Equipment Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Jack Bryan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.