Newman Importing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
Plaintiff seeks classification of its imported tents as sport equipment1 instead of the classification assigned by the customs officials under a residual provision for articles of textile materials.2 Plaintiff claims these tents are designed for use in the sport of backpacking. Defendant argues that backpacking is not a sport and, even assuming it is, these tents are not used in the sport in the sense in which sport equipment must be used. Defendant also argues that these tents are not of the quality used in “serious” backpacking and further that a legislative intent existed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cruger's Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- American Astral Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- Sports Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rollerblade, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- United States v. Standard Surplus Sales, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Standard Surplus SalesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Streetsurfing LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
- Camel Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.