Legal Opinion

Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1943No. C. D. 758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

This suit against the United States was brought'at the port of New York to recover customs duties claimed to have been illegally assessed upon certain croquet sets composed of balls and mallets and other articles ordinarily used in conjunction therewith. The merchandise was described on the invoice as Wimbledon Croquet or Wimbledon Championship Croquet sets.

*223The complete sets were assessed with duty at 30 per centum ad valorem under the provision of paragraph 1502, Tariff Act of 1930, reading as follows:

Par. 1502. Boxing gloves, baseballs, footballs, tennis balls, golf…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Columbia Shipbuilding Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Cruger's Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Lang Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trans Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Better Houseware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Protests 55926-K of AbercrombieUnited States Customs Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API