Thompson v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. B. Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
It is conceded by respondent that appellant has made a fair statement of the' facts and we may, therefore, substantially adopt the same. The action is for personal injuries- to plaintiff, resulting from a collision between an automobile driven by him and a freight train of appellant. The collision occurred July 18, 1912, about 4 o’clock P. M., at a grade crossing of a public highway. The crossing is located about one mile south of Dinuba, in the county of Tulare, and the train was, at the time of the accident, in charge of defendant Keith, as engineer, and defendant Rhone, as conductor.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Griffin v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Hutson v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Koster v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Billig v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Murray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.