Legal Opinion
Gulbrandson v. Ryan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2013No. Nos. 07-99012, 09-72779PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on March 18, 2013, are amended. The superseding amended opinion and dissent will be filed concurrently with this order.
*981With these amendments, a majority of the panel has voted to deny appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. Judge Nelson would grant the petition. Judge Raw-linson and Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nelson recommended granting it. The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. The petition for rehearing and the petition…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Richard Hurles v. Charles L. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Christopher Taft Landers v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Ezell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Frank Atwood v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Martin Kipp v. Ron DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.