Legal Opinion

Christopher Taft Landers v. Warden

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 23, 2015No. 13-11898PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARCUS, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Christopher Taft Landers, an Alabama inmate, appeals from a district court order denying his habeas petition without holding an evidentiary hearing. Landers challenges the adequacy of the state court’s fact-finding procedure on collateral review: he claims that the Alabama court’s finding that he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel — a finding the court made on the basis of dueling affidavits, without an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Rule 32 of the Alabama Rules of Criminal Procedure — was “an unreasonable determination of the facts” under 28…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Robert Anthony Preston, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Willie James Pye v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Nejad v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Ronald Clark, Jr. . Attorney General, State of FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Christopher Teasley v. Warden, Macon State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API