Legal Opinion

Ezell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2015No. 14-71696PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Terry L. Ezell asks us to certify his filing of a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition in the Western District of Washington, where he was convicted in 2008 of being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court sentenced Ezell under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Ezell argues that his second or successive petition is warranted because in Descamps v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2276, 186 L.Ed.2d 438 (2013), the Supreme Court announced a “new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. In re: Marvin GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  3. Michael Allen v. Richard IvesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Courtney Mays v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Karen Chades v. Molly HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API