Legal Opinion
Heikkinen v. Cashen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 1931No. 28,372PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial.
Main street in Bovey runs east and west and is paved. The distance between curbs is 56 feet 8 inches. It is part of trunk highway No. 35. Cars "park at the curb at an. angle of about 45 degrees. On Saturday evening, April 26,1930, at about 8:30 o’clock defendant was driving his automobile easterly on the south side of Main street. Plaintiff’s decedent was standing on the left-hand side of an automobile, talking to the occupants thereof, parked on the south side of the street some 20 to 40…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Saunders v. Yellow Cab Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Peterson v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Hollander v. DietrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pryor's Administrator v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Tri-State Transit Co. of Louisiana, Inc. v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
- Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Guthrie v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Deach v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.