Legal Opinion

Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 24, 1930No. 27,879PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries wherein plaintiff had a verdict, and defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial.

Arthur Charles Shotts, a minor, is the real party in interest and will be referred to as the plaintiff although the suit was instituted by his father as natural guardian. The injuries were caused by. an automobile driven by defendant Sailstead, an employe of his codefendant, Standard Oil Company of Indiana. The one serious question is whether the evidence justified the jury in finding that Sail-stead Avas at the time in the course…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barg v. BousfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Elliason v. Western Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Piepho v. M. Sigbert-Awes Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Behrens v. Hawkeye Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Fransen v. Kellogg Toasted Corn Flake Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Perfection Mattress & Spring Co. v. WindhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Ashland Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Loucks v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Squillace v. Village of Mountain IronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API