Legal Opinion
United States v. Hopf
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided August 14, 1952No. 372PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused, upon trial by general court-martial in Korea, pleaded not guilty to but was found guilty of assault with intent to do bodily harm with a dangerous weapon in violation . of Article of War 93,' 10 USC § 1565. The court sentenced him to dishonorable discharge, total forfeiture of pay and allowances and confinement for three years. Army reviewing authorities have upheld the findings and sentence. The Judge Advocate General has certified the case to us on the issue of whether the findings were fatally variant from the specification. In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. MarkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. EmersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. LeeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. FinchCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. BryantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.