Legal Opinion
Application of Louis H. Libby
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 24, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6358PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2, 5, and 7 of appellant’s application, No. 154,739, for a patent on a cleaning composition. The remaining claims of the application were held to be not readable on the elected species and were not considered by the board. Accordingly they are not before us for consideration. In re Hill, 158 F.2d 1001, 34 C.C.P.A., Patents, 783.
Claims 2, 5, and 7 are dependent upon claim 1 and are each more specific than that claim as to one of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re KeplerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re GauerkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- In re BourdonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In Re EbertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In re HillCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- Aetna Steel Products Corporation v. Southwest Products Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Ruth v. Blue River ConstructorsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Hupp Corporation, a Virginia Corporation v. Lambert Industries, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Industrial Ceramics, Inc.,a Minnesota Corporation, and Agard L. Lambert, Lambert Industries, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Industrial Ceramics, Inc.,a Minnesota Corporation, and Agard L. Lambert v. American Infra-Red Radiant Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Huppcorporation, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966