State v. Horner

Defendant appeals his convictions for various property crimes, including two counts of identity theft, and crimes associated with flight from police. In his opening brief, defendant argues that, under OEC 404(3)1 and State v. Leistiko, 352 Or 172, 282 P3d 857, modified on recons, 352 Or 622, 292 P3d 522 (2012), the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his nine prior identity theft convictions to prove that he had an intent “to deceive or to defraud” in this case, because he did not concede that he “possesse[d] *** the personal identification[s] of [others],” ORS 165.800(1), and the…