Legal Opinion

United States v. Fred James Lemay, III

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 9, 2001No. 00-30193PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TROTT; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge PAEZ.

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Fred LeMay appeals his convictions for two counts of child molestation in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 3231. We must decide whether admission of his prior acts of child molestation under Rule 414 of the Federal Rules of Evidence violated his constitutional right to due process. We agree with numerous other courts that Rule 403 remains applicable to evidence introduced under Rule 414, and, if conscientiously applied, will protect defendants from propensity evidence so inflammatory as to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. People v. DonohoIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. Walter v. Cross, A/K/A Bobo Walter v. Cross, United States of America v. Jules C. MelograneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. Watkins; People v. PullenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. David Litmon, Jr. v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API