Legal Opinion

Baumrind v. Ewing

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 19, 1981No. 21455PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice:

Respondent Vernon E. Baumrind brought this action for alienation of affection and criminal conversation against appellants James H. Ewing, M.D., individually and as a Professional Association [Ewing]. Before trial Ewing moved to suppress certain recorded telephone conversations as viola-tive of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C., § 2510, et seq. [the Act]. The trial judge found the Act inapplicable and denied the motion. This appeal followed. We affirm.

The recordings in question are the product of interspousal espionage. Suspecting his wife’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rickenbaker v. RickenbakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Donald Ray Pritchard v. Zee Warren PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  2. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Glazner v. GlaznerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  5. Ransom v. RansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API