Legal Opinion

Rickenbaker v. Rickenbaker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1976No. 95PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming that portion of the trial court’s order which suppressed all evidence resulting from the interception of the plaintiff’s telephone communications.

18 U.S.C. § 2511, in part, provides:(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who—(a) willfully intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire or oral communication;(b) willfully uses, endeavors to use, or procures any other person to use or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Gemsco, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. William Allan JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Donald Ray Pritchard v. Zee Warren PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Glazner v. GlaznerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources Ex Rel. Wright v. David L.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API