Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Ransom

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1985No. 41194, 41347PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

While husband and wife were residing together, husband tape-recorded telephone conversations wife conducted in the marital residence, concededly without wife’s consent or knowledge. Wife subsequently filed suit for divorce. During discovery she became aware for the first time that husband possessed tape-recordings of her telephone conversations and intended to use them at the divorce trial to prove her infidelity during the marriage. Wife then filed a motion in limine, on the basis of OCGA §§ 16-11-62 (1) and 16-11-67, to prevent the admission of these tapes or their contents at trial.

OCGA §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollowell v. JoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Wilson v. Board of Regents of the University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Stamme v. StammeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Baumrind v. EwingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Burgeson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Catherine A. Heggy v. T.L. HeggyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  4. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API