Legal Opinion
Glazner v. Glazner
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 16, 2003No. 02-11799PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBINA, Circuit Judge:
We took this case en banc to decide the continued validity of Simpson v. Simpson, 490 F.2d 803 (5th Cir.1974),1 a decision of our predecessor circuit finding an implied exception in Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Acts of 1968 (“Title III”) for interspousal wiretapping within the marital home. For the reasons that follow, we overrule the Simpson decision. We also conclude that the rule we announce today applies retroactively.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts and procedural history of this case are taken largely from the panel decision. See Glazner v.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dan Carmichael McCarthan v. Director of Goodwill Industries-Suncoast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Crowe v. BolducCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Maureen Riccio v. Sentry Credit IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Randy Lamar Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Nunez-Reyes v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.