Legal Opinion

McIntire v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1990No. C6-89-2265PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. In action seeking damages for alleged violation of free speech rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , the trial court correctly determined that agency's executive director, personnel director, and supervisor had a qualified immunity from liability for conduct which did not violate clearly established constitutional rights.

2. Claims alleging liberty and due process violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 were properly dismissed because claimant failed to show a protectible property interest in continued employment or a violation of liberty interest that could withstand summary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. El Deeb v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Piekarski v. Home Owners Savings Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Hagen v. SchirmersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API