McIntire v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Syllabus by the Court
1. In action seeking damages for alleged violation of free speech rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , the trial court correctly determined that agency's executive director, personnel director, and supervisor had a qualified immunity from liability for conduct which did not violate clearly established constitutional rights.
2. Claims alleging liberty and due process violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 were properly dismissed because claimant failed to show a protectible property interest in continued employment or a violation of liberty interest that could withstand summary…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- El Deeb v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Piekarski v. Home Owners Savings Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Hagen v. SchirmersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.