Legal Opinion
Xerox Corp. v. Media Sciences International, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 14, 2007No. 06 Civ. 4872(RJH)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.
Defendants Media Sciences International, Inc. and Media Sciences, Inc. (collectively, “MS”) bring antitrust counterclaims against plaintiff Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2 (2006). MS alleges that Xerox monopolized or attempted to monopolize the market for replacement solid ink sticks for use in Xerox phase change color printers. Xerox moves to dismiss the antitrust counterclaims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Concord Associates, L.P. v. Entertainment Properties TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Radiancy, Inc. v. Viatek Consumer Products Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Allen v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.