Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Burchinal

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2012No. 2011-1426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher James Burchinal of Delaware, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0071503, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1999. On February 1, 2011, relator, disciplinary counsel, filed a four-count complaint charging Burchinal with misappropriating funds on three occasions in violation of Prof.Cond.R. 1.15(c) (requiring a lawyer to deposit advance payments of fees and expenses in a trust account for withdrawal as fees are earned and expenses incurred), 8.4(c) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. DixonOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. KraemerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GerrenOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ClaflinOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Toledo Bar Assn. v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. GildeeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GorbyOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Trumbull Cty. Bar Assn. v. Dull (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ScribnerOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Burchinal (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API