Legal Opinion

Winston v. New Mexico State Police Board

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1969No. 8655PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOBLE, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to a regulation adopted by the State Police Board April 26, 1967, effective June 1, 1967, A. P. Winston, then 57 years of age, was involuntarily retired as a state police officer because he had completed thirty years of service. In a declaratory judgment proceeding, the trial court declared the Board to be without lawful authority to require Winston’s involuntary retirement prior to his attaining the statutory mandatory retirement age of 61, and permanently enjoined and restrained the Board from attempting to enforce the retirement order. The State Police…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Drink, Inc. v. BabcockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Morrow v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bokum Resources Corp. v. New Mexico Water Quality Control CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Howell v. HeimNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Arnold v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API