Legal Opinion
Drink, Inc. v. Babcock
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 7, 1966No. 7942PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
This appeal requires our determination of whether the fair-trade contract and minimum markup provisions of the Liquor Control Act are constitutional.
Plaintiff corporation, a retail liquor dealer, sought a declaratory judgment to determine the constitutionality of §§ 46-9-1, 46-9-3, and 46-9-11, N.M.S.A. 1953,-or, in the alternative, an injunction to prohibit enforcement of those provisions of the law by the director of the liquor division. The trial court held that there was a failure to prove the challenged provisions to be unconstitutional and denied injunctive relief.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage ControlSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Hovey Concrete Products Co. v. MechemNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Schwartz v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Winston v. New Mexico State Police BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Fort v. NealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- United States Brewers Ass'n v. Director of the New Mexico Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.