Legal Opinion
Howell v. Heim
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 28, 1994No. 20490PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BACA, Justice.
Defendants-Appellants Richard Heim, William Dunbar, and the New Mexico Human Services Department (collectively referred to as the “HSD”) appeal from a trial court order in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees Tana Howell, Janet Brown, Catherine Bare-la, and other similarly-situated plaintiffs (collectively referred to as the “Plaintiffs”). The trial court concluded that a regulation promulgated by the HSD, Income Support Div., N.M. Human Serv. Dep’t Reg. 346 (Dec. 23, 1991) (referred to as “Regulation 346”), which terminated state-funded general assistance disability benefits…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Las Cruces v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.