Legal Opinion

Stang v. Hertz Corporation

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1970No. 8979PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

Petitioners seek a review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, which reversed the trial court in a case arising under our Wrongful Death Act, § 22-20-1 through 22-20-3, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp. The facts are adequately set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeals in Stang v. Hertz, Corp., 81 N.M. 69, 463 P.2d 45 (Ct.App. 1969), and will not be detailed herein, except to state that decedent was a nun, a member of the Sisters of Charity, and had taken the simple but perpetual vow of poverty upon entering the Order. She died some fifteen days after receiving injuries in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Barnes v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Chase v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Hogsett v. HannaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Stang v. Hertz CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lujan v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Murphy v. Martin Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API