Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. National Lead Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 25, 1957No. 63PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The sole question involved in this proceeding under § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act 1 concerns the power of the Commission in framing an order pursuant to its finding that respondents had conspired to adopt and use a zone delivered pricing system in their sale of lead pigments. 2 In its general cease and desist order prohibiting concert of action among respondents in the further use of such system, the Commission inserted a provision directing each respondent individually to cease and desist from adopting the same or a similar system of pricing for the purpose or with the effect of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Falls City Industries, Inc. v. Vanco Beverage, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. Toys "R" US, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API