Legal Opinion

Hess v. Young

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

— Samuel M. Young brought.suit against Francis J. Hess, Benjamin F. Watson, Charles H. Tinker and John W. Crámpton, upon the following complaint:

“ Plaintiff complaining says, that, in the month of December, 1871, the defendants Watson and Tinker were *380the owners of letters-patent from the United States, for certain improvements in screening grain and seed, and defendant Crampton was their agent for the sale of said patent-right territory; that, at said time, said defendant Hess conspired with the other defendants to cheat and defraud plaintiff, in this, to wit: The said Crampton, as agent and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Conner v. WintonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Lovejoy v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Shelly v. VanarsdollIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Jenkins v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Slayback v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API