Legal Opinion
Hess v. Young
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 9 opinions
From the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.
— Samuel M. Young brought.suit against Francis J. Hess, Benjamin F. Watson, Charles H. Tinker and John W. Crámpton, upon the following complaint:
“ Plaintiff complaining says, that, in the month of December, 1871, the defendants Watson and Tinker were *380the owners of letters-patent from the United States, for certain improvements in screening grain and seed, and defendant Crampton was their agent for the sale of said patent-right territory; that, at said time, said defendant Hess conspired with the other defendants to cheat and defraud plaintiff, in this, to wit: The said Crampton, as agent and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Conner v. WintonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Lovejoy v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Shelly v. VanarsdollIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Jenkins v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Slayback v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Meland v. YoungbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.