Meland v. Youngberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action transferred to the district court for Becker county. Tbe complaint alleged two causes of action, the first for damages for alleged fraud and deceit in the exchange of certain machinery and the second for damages for breach of an alleged oral warranty. The substance of the complaint is stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Nye, J., who granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the action. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff and one John Chial were the owners, subject to a chattel mortgage, of a steam plowing rig consisting of a 25 horse-power Beeves engine and 10 plows. Defendant was the sole owner of a second-hand 22 horse-power gasolene traction engine, and he and Chial were the owners of six plows used therewith. On December 18, 1911, plaintiff and defendant entered into the following contract for the exchange of properties which was executed in duplicate’:'
“This agreement made and entered into by and between A. F. Youngberg party of the first part and John Meland party of the second part:
“…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Farnsworth v. DuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Berryman v. RiegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Baylies v. Vanden BoomWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Hamilton v. GalbraithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Osborn v. WillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.