Legal Opinion

Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. Pierce

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1884No. 10,445PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Complaint in three paragraphs by the appellee against the appellant and two other railroad companies, for the alleged killing of a horse by the appellant, as lessee of a railroad running from Terre Haute, Indiana, to Rock-ville, Indiana. The appellee’s right to recover was based, in the first and third paragraphs of his complaint, upon the failure of the appellant to fence securely the railroad at the place where the animal entered upon the same and was killed. The second paragraph seeks to recover upon the ground of negligence.

The appellant’s answer was in two paragraphs. The first was a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conner v. WintonIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Lovejoy v. RobinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Shelly v. VanarsdollIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Mark v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Judah v. Trustees of Vincennes UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Opple v. RayIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Avery v. DoughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API