Legal Opinion

Worley v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7721PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The first paragraph of the appellee’s complaint alleges that a mistake was made in computing interest in the settlement of accounts between him and the appellant, and that, by reason of such mistake, he was induced to pay the' appellant a much greater sum than was due him. Two points are made against this paragraph. First, that it is insufficient, because it does not show notice of the mistake to the appellant prior to the commencement of the action. Second, that it is insufficient, because it does not aver an offer to place the parties in the position they occupied at the time the settlement…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Lafayette & Indianapolis Railroad v. PattisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Matlock v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Bunger v. RoddyIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Thompson v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Robinson v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ArmStrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API