Securities & Exchange Commission v. Toomey
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 12(f), Fed.R.Civ.P., to strike eight of the eleven affirmative defenses asserted by defendant Robert Toomey. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Robert Toomey is a former Vice President of The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. (“A & P”). William Merrigan is a former employee of A & P. The instant case concerns the involvement of Merrigan and others in securities transactions in the stock of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Susan R. Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., John R. Loomis and Joseph Stein, Jr., Individually and as Co-Partners of First Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Rhett G. Campbell, Trustee, Joseph C. Canizaro, Intervenor-Appellant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Alco Pacific, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Coach, Inc. v. Kmart CorporationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LorinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. McCaskeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- County Vanlines Inc. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.