Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. McCaskey
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 5, 1999No. 98 Civ. 6153(SWK)PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
In this action alleging violations of the federal securities laws, plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and third-party defendant Gruntal & Co. (“Gruntal”) move, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u(g), to dismiss defendants Douglas G. McCaskey’s (“McCaskey”), Neal D. Fitzpatrick’s (“Fitzpatrick”), and Hope D. Trowbridge’s (“Trowbridge”) third-party complaint. The SEC also moves, pursuant to Section 78u(g), to dismiss McCaskey’s, Fitzpatrick’s and Trowbridge’s counterclaim and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f), to strike certain affirmative…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Salcer v. Envicon Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Electronics Warehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1988
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LorinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- GEOMC Co., Ltd. v. Calmare Therapeutics Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Coach, Inc. v. Kmart CorporationsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- United States v. East River Housing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. PennDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.