Sheffield v. Clifford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. Blended with the motion was a motion to strike out, amend, add to, and substitute other findings and conclusions.
An order denying a motion to amend, add to, strike out, or substitute other findings of fact or conclusions of law, or both, made by the trial court in a case tried without a jury, is not appealable. When such a motion is blended with a motion for a new trial and is denied, as a whole, the order is appealable as an order denying a motion for a new trial. On such an appeal our rule is that errors may be assigned…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Bahr v. Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Kent v. CostinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Mann v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by16 opinions
- Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Schaedler v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Alsdorf v. SvobodaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Olson v. Kennedy Trading Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.