Legal Opinion

Unke v. Thorpe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1953No. File 9347PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The complaint of the plaintiff, W. E. Unke, prays for damages because the defendants, F. L. Thorpe and C. W. Waters, who had agreed in writing to sell and deliver to him “600 to 800” bushels of álfalfa seed, delivered to him only about 301 bushels of such seed. The defense that the contract was induced by fraud was sustained by the trial court and judgment dismissing the action was entered. The principal assignments question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings, and whether the findings support the judgment. Because we have concluded the undisputed facts reveal that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eustis Mining Co. v. Beer, Sondheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1917
  2. Janssen v. TushaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Barkemeyer Grain & Seed Co. v. HannantMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Dixson v. LaddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Sejnoha v. BuchananSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mitzel v. HauckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Weeks v. Prostrollo Sons, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Renner Elevator Co. v. SchuerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. American Reliable Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Black Hills Power & Light Company v. SchuftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API