Legal Opinion

Black Hills Power & Light Company v. Schuft

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1972No. File 10821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff herein seeks a declaratory judgment pursuant to SDCL 21-24 to determine the rights and obligations of the parties hereto.

The factual background of the case is as follows. Commencing in the spring of 1878 and continuing until 1903, one David M. Dorsett farmed in Lawrence and 'Butte Counties, and irrigated his farm with water from the Redwater River which forms the boundary between Lawrence and Butte Counties and meanders through the Dorsett farm. The defendants herein now own the Dorsett farm. Dorsett and his neighbors to the west had a small irrigation canal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huffman v. ShevlinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Percival v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  3. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. FreerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Unke v. ThorpeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Bryan v. Idaho Quartz Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northwest Realty Co. v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Prairie Hills Water & Development Co. v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Steele v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Steele v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API