Mitzel v. Hauck
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBiegelmeier, J.
This is an action for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff riding in a motor vehicle owned and driven by defendant while on a dbck hunting trip. At the time of the accident both parties were seventeen years of age; they appeared in the action by guardians ad litem. At the dose of plaintiff’s case, the trial court directed a verdict for defendant for the reason plaintiff had not shown defendant’s conduct was wilful and wanton as required by SDC 44.0362. The five young men in the hunting party discussed the trip Sunday noon and, as plaintiff has urged that he was not a guest within the terms…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- Rocha v. HulenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Kudrna v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Weller v. Spring Creek Resort, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Famous Brands, Inc. v. David Sherman CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Jennings v. HodgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- Blue Fox Bar, Inc. v. City of YanktonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Boyd v. AlguireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.