Legal Opinion

People v. Avery

California Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2002No. S092426PublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Under California law, theft requires an intent to permanently deprive another of property. (See People v. Ortega (1998) 19 Cal.4th 686, 693 [80 Cal.Rptr.2d 489, 968 P.2d 48].) We granted review to determine whether this requirement is satisfied by the intent to take the property only temporarily, but for so extended a period of time as to deprive the owner of a major portion of its value or enjoyment. We conclude such an intent is sufficient.

I. Procedural History

A court convicted defendant of arson and found true that he had suffered a prior serious felony conviction,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. YearwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API