Legal Opinion

People v. Righetti

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1884No. 20,003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo county. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

Information for grand larceny. The defendant, Thomas Eighetti, was separately tried.

The information charges the theft to have been of thirty sacks of barley, of the value of forty-five dollars, and seven sacks of wheat, of the value of twelve dollars, all of the value of fifty-seven dollars, the property of Mark Elberg; and that the offense was committed in the county of San Luis Obispo, on the 20th of September, 1883.

1. There is nothing in the point that the information should have averred “ that the value stated was in current coin of the United States.” (People v. Poggi, 19 Cal.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SpragueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  2. People v. PoggiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. State v. MerloOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In re McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. MullenaxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API