City Street Improvement Co. v. Laird
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action upon a street assessment in the city and county of San Francisco. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from this judgment and an order denying a new trial the defendants have appealed.
The work ordered to be done, and for which the assessment was made, is the paving with bituminous rock of the roadway of the crossing of Market and Noe streets. A resolution of intention therefor was passed April 22, 1895, and within ten days thereafter certain property-owners filed with the clerk of the board of supervisors a protest against the work. This protest was referred by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- California Improvement Co. v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- City Street Improvement Co. v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Reid v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Belser v. AllmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Stein v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Brown v. SllvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- First Nat'l Fin. Corp. v. Five-O Drilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Taylor v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.