Taylor v. Manson
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Lloyd S. Ackerman, Stratton & Kaufman, Finch & Melsted, and Devoto & Richardson, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This action was brought against the defendants Manson, Schmitz, Woodward and Casey, members of and constituting the board of public works of the city and county of San Francisco, and against the other defendants as sureties upon their official bonds, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by falling off a sidewalk in the city and county of San Francisco, alleged to have been in a defective condition and dangerous to the traveling public. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered, and this appeal is from the judgment and an order…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Robinson v. . ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Lane v. . Town of HancockNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of Gosport v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Nicholson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Dillwood v. RiecksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- South v. County of San BenitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.