Legal Opinion
First Nat'l Fin. Corp. v. Five-O Drilling Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1930No. Docket No. L.A. 10322PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This is an action to recover upon a trade acceptance. The instrument sued on reads as follows:
“Trade Acceptance
“Long Beach Branch
“Security Trust & Savings Bank
“Long Beach, Calif.
“ (Head office Los Angeles)
“32970 Long Beach, California, February 7th, 1923 Due Apl 7th, ’23.
“On April 7th, 1923, pay to order of Ourselves Twenty-five Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($2500.00).
“The obligation of the acceptor hereof arises out of the purchase of goods from the drawer. The drawee may accept this bill payable at any bank, banker or trust company in the United States which he may designate.
‘ ‘ To Roy Evans…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Mining Co. v. Anglo-Californian BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Pauly v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Betts v. Southern California Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hurley v. OrnsteenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Crittenden v. McCloudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Auto Auction, Inc. v. Riding MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.