Legal Opinion
State v. Losh
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 2008No. A06-1910PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Appellant William Losh, who is a member of the Mille Lacs Band of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, challenges his conviction of driving a motor vehicle after revocation, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 171.24, subd. 2 (2006), arguing that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction. The district court found jurisdiction on the ground that the offense occurred within the boundaries of the Leech Lake Reservation and that Losh is not a member of the Leech Lake Band. The court of appeals affirmed, but on different grounds. State v. Losh, 739 N.W.2d 730, 736 (Minn.App.2007).…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. LidsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- League of Women Voters Minnesota v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Weiler v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In Re the Welfare of M.J.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re C. S. N.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.