League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*640OPINION
2Per curiam
This action was brought under Minn. Stat. § 204B.44 (2010), seeking to correct an alleged error in the preparation of the ballot for the general election. Specifically, petitioners seek to prevent the people of Minnesota from voting on the question of whether photographic identification should be required to vote in Minnesota. The court is unanimous in concluding that petitioners are not entitled to this unprecedented relief.1 We express no opinion in this case as to the merits of changing Minnesota law to require photographic identification to vote; that question, as petitioners…
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Crawford v. Marion County Election BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Keith v. DaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Dereje v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- City of Hartford v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Jerome Deon Nunn v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.