Legal Opinion

Illinois v. Lidster

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 13, 2004No. 02-1060PublishedCited by 340 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Breyer

This Fourth Amendment case focuses upon a highway checkpoint where police stopped motorists to ask them for information about a recent hit-and-run accident. We hold that the police stops were reasonable, hence, constitutional.

*422I

The relevant background is as follows: On Saturday, August 23,1997, just after midnight, an unknown motorist traveling eastbound on a highway in Lombard, Illinois, struck and killed a 70-year-old bicyclist. The motorist drove off without identifying himself. About one week later at about the same time of night and at about the same place, local police set up a highway…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by340 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Al-Kidd v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Shukri BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. Derrick L. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

335 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API